I have always said that a NavStar Global Positioning System (GPS) 
	receiver is an outstanding tool for use in CAP Emergency Services missions. 
	  Always wanting to put my money where my mouth is, I purchased one a number 
	of years ago.   I came to several conclusions after considerable 
	experimentation.   
	A GPS unit is a tool for someone who is already proficient with a map and 
	compass.   If you can't navigate "the old fashioned way," you have no 
	business performing ES operations.   Machines fail, batteries die, and 
	signals can be hard to receive.   Know the basics before you try advanced 
	things.
	Prior to owning a GPS receiver, I've had ample opportunity to borrow 
	units from work, other CAP members, or CAP-owned equipment.   On several 
	occasions this equipment was loaned to me at the last minute.   It is not a 
	good time to learn to operate a GPS receiver just as you are leaving mission 
	base.   I've had my team members become enamored with GPS magic and fail to 
	pay attention to anything else--they sit there and play with the toy instead 
	of minding the mission.   Some gentle reminding will get these folks back in 
	the game.   The end result in these cases is that the GPS receiver becomes a 
	hindrance rather than a useful tool.   You can spend all their time learning 
	how to operate the GPS, or you can use your map and compass to get the job 
	done.   I've also had similar experiences in the aircraft with GPS and LORAN 
	equipment.   Rather than pay attention to conventional NAVAIDs, I've had 
	both mission pilots and observers attempt to figure out the LORAN.   Again, 
	it can be a useful tool, or you can become a slave to the machine.   The 
	moral is that you need to know how to operate the GPS (to a good level of 
	proficiency) if you are going to use it.   Otherwise rely on your 
	tried-and-true methods. 
	A GPS unit can reduce your dependency on the need for a map.   Saying 
	that worries me that I mean you don't need a map when you go into the field 
	or climb into the airplane--that is not the case.   A map is one of your 
	most basic and essential tools.   In a pinch, however, you might be able to 
	get by without one for a brief period of time.   This is because many GPS 
	units will "make" a map for you--a plotting of your track as you progress.   
	If you name waypoints, like your mission base, then you have references with 
	which you can return.   
	Extremely proficient users of their GPS may even be able to use it to 
	triangulate a fix during an electronic search.   When you are in location B1 
	(where you take your first bearing), have the GPS plot the bearing to the 
	signal.   Repeat this from another location (at least once).   Create a new 
	waypoint where the vectors cross.   Under ideal conditions, that will be the 
	location of the ELT.   Any electronic searcher will know how to do this 
	method on a map, but only advanced navigators can do it directly on their 
	GPS.   It would be foolish not to back yourself up on your map, however.  
	
	Relying solely on a GPS for navigation breaks down quickly, however, with 
	the slightest hint of operator error, bad equipment, or poor GPS coverage.   
	Furthermore, even all those things work perfectly, you may not get to the 
	target in the most rapid means available.   Pilots may fly through special 
	use airspace and ground teams will not know the availability of roads to the 
	location.   
	Ultimately the point is that a GPS unit can give you such a high 
	situational awareness that you may find that you're using it as your primary 
	reference in navigation.   I think this is acceptable--as long as you can 
	back yourself up by other means. 
	It is said elsewhere in this site that aircrews should be familiar in 
	utilizing their GPS or LORAN for aiding them in a grid search.   Ground 
	teams should be equally familiar in using a GPS unit to aid them in an 
	area search as well.   In addition to tried-and-true methods such as 
	flagging, a ground team navigator can mark positions in his or her GPS unit 
	and search in relation to that point.   
	These words are intended to stimulate discussion and training practices. 
	  It is hoped that objective was achieved.   I would sincerely appreciate 
	contributions of your GPS experiences, especially SSTV or APRS issues.